
GOCEA QR CODE
中国ㆍ중국ㆍChina



Visitors
Total : 56,643,810Today : 15,228
Yesterday : 25,766
Page View
Total : 197,993,648Today : 15,228
Yesterday : 25,766
■ MembershipㆍAward Sites!
![]() | ||||||||||||||
About Award Sites! Set Standards . . . for website award and review programs so that interested submitters know the quality of the award relative to strict criteria and rules. Even the award issuing site's overall design and presentation is considered by a highly seasoned and qualified rating panel in determining an award program's rating. There are six general rating level sections with separate general and theme menus for the 3.0 to 5.0 levels. Moreover, 3.0 to 5.0 rating levels are presented on individual pages with at least one award image . . . and the 5.0 rated award program pages include a screenshot of the respective index/entry page. | ||||||||||||||
|
■ MembershipㆍWebsAwards
![]() | ||
WebsAwards There are 5 general rating level sections with separate general and theme menus for the 1 to 5. |
Previous Membership by WebsAwards Founder Nikola Kitanovic | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||
![]() |
WebsAwards INDEXING YOUR AWARD PROGRAMS AS THE BLUE BLOOD OF THE INTERNET How to make an Award Program, Award Resources, Code of Ethics,... |
![]() | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
|
■ Membership - Euro Award Index

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
The Euro-Award-Index as well as the Deutsche-Award-Prufstelle work differently from the usual award-lists on the internet. Every award here has been carefully examined and we confirm the professionality of the allocation of the awards. We don't want to adress only the "professional" awardmasters. Therefore we adopted, following the American example, a system using five levels. If you meet the first level's minimal standard, you will be admitted to our index. We want to encourage beginners to apply. It is self-evident that the awards even on the lowest level meet our examiners' high standards. You will find further information in the category "Criteria". Professionals as well as amateurs are welcome to apply again at any time, in order to achive a higher rating after their sites' revision. | |||||||
![]() |
Dear friend, I am happy to tell you , that the jury (of course without you) decides to give you the EAI - Order of Merit for your special "work" for the webawards!! Congratulation. More information about that is in the "awards" - "order of merit" section. Feel free to use one or both of theses badges for your homepage. Have a good night, Roland Received: Oct. 05, 2002 | ||||||
![]() | |||||||
| |||||||
Copyright of the EAI / DtAP |
■ Membership - UWSAG
![]() |
![]() | |||
![]() |
![]() | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||
| ||||
UWSAG's rating levels are not an indication of an award's popularity, or of how many people have received your award. UWSAG strives to give value and achievement to the award giver/seeker. As an award giver and/or webmaster you play a vital role in making the overall internet experience better. |
■ Membership - RAU & R-IWA
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |
![]() |
![]() | |
The purpose of RAU can be divided into four basic groups : 1. Help to all who want to inprove their own existing awards program. 2. Help to all who search for awards, instructions how to improve their sites in order to make award winning easier 3. Ethical evaluation of the site according to how family friendly/children safe they are 4. Education and establishing of web site evaluators? web experts and ethics experts |
■ Membership - Olymp Award Index
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | |||
The Olymp Award Index assigns rating seals with the Rating level of 1.0 to 6.0. Further explanations are listed under the criteria section. With these Rating's we give beginners a chance to develop their Award Program. We are open for all questions about Awards, even if you do not want to apply for a rating seal. At present only German-language and English sites are accepted. | ||||||
|
■ Membership - Anti - Stimm-Award
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
More and more we see innumerably gained awards on a lot of sites. The most of the visitors think by the visitations of these sites, "WOW, these site must be well" : "The webmaster has a lot of experience about Homepages" : "I haven't any awards yet but he has so much of them". "Is he so good?"... But in many instances these are only voting and fake-awards. By the voting-award there are a number of sites for vote and the visitors are supposed to vote for the best of them. Okay there for it was imagined ... But any time some of the webmasters were so clever, and thought, I could send my visitors to these sites and then they can vote for me. After a time more and more people follow this idea but then the voting-award-master got the idea to give these subscriber a button on the way. The idea was simple. X place a award, the visitors are estimate, X must send the award, X is giving his subscriber a button, which the candidate must place apparitional on his site, to get more voting's and visitors. There for, if you have more voting-awards more visitors will come to your site. |